• Non Radiation Breast Cancer Screening

  • Full Body Scans, Thyroid Scans, and other Health Screening Scans

  • No Contact, No Compression

  • Pain-Free

  • Our Equipment Is High Resolution, FDA 510K Cleared

Thermography is an excellent screening tool for detecting  breast health, thyroid issues, nerve disorders and many disease processes in the body.  In 1982 it was cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an adjunct screening method for detecting breast cancer. 
Since 1982, thermology technology has improved greatly. There are numerous studies that show the benefits of thermography in detecting disease processes in the body.  When combined with other screening methods such as mammography, ultrasound and manual breast exams, there is a 97% sensitivity for detecting breast cancer.  


therm vollara-sm-logo.png

We use Vollara Air Purifying technology in our scan rooms.  To learn more visit: 



thermo image.jpg

Why Thermography?

thermo squamous.jpg

Thermographic imaging cameras detect heat patterns and changes on the skin surface associated with physiological changes in the body.  Cancer cells in their earliest stage produce new blood vessels that are used to "feed" the tumor.  This blood flow in turn produces patterns of temperature changes that are abnormal.  

These physiological changes can be detected on thermographic images years before cancerous changes begin in the body. The role thermographic imaging plays in breast cancer and other breast disorders (fibrocystic breast disease) is to help in the earliest detection possible.  Thermographic images establish risk factors that can then be monitored for physiological changes over time. 

Women of all ages can benefit from breast thermographic imaging.  Since there is NO RADIATION, NO CONTACT, NO COMPRESSION, women with dense breasts, breast implants, pregnant women, and women with small breasts are especially benefitted. 

   We hold certification through the

* Thermographic imaging is an excellent adjunct, radiation free screening tool that when combined with other screening methods (mammography, ultrasound, and physical exam) can provide the best total picture of breast health. 


Thermography in a (huge) Nutshell

Cancer cells are different than healthy cells. For one, they use a lot more sugar. For another, they give off a lot more heat.

Chemical and blood vessel activity in the area surrounding a developing breast cancer is almost always higher than in the normal breast. Cancer cells need an abundant supply of nutrients to maintain their growth and this increased blood flow can increase the surface temperatures of the breast. When a tumor is forming, it develops its own blood supply to feed its accelerated growth, a process known as malignant angiogenesis. Pre-cancerous tissues can start this process well in advance of the cells becoming malignant.

Thermography measures the skin’s autonomic response to that inflammation – its “heat signature”.


The technology converts infrared radiation emitted from the skin surface into electrical impulses that are visualized in color. The spectrum of colors indicates an increase or decrease in the amount of infrared radiation being emitted from the body surface.

Professionals look for asymmetry in the heat pattern. In other words, how might one breast differ from another?

The August 2007 issue of Radiology bemoans the growing number of mammography centers across the United States that are closing down. Radiologists blame low reimbursement from the insurance companies and a frightening degree of liability.


With mammograms, the false negative reading rates (not detecting cancers) range from 10% to 40%.

According to the 2002 Breast Cancer Study, issued by the Physician Insurers Association of America (PIAA), internists were named in 7% of the surveyed failure-to-diagnose breast cancer suits brought during the 1990s. Family physicians were named in 11% of cases and gynecologists in 29%. Radiologists topped the list, however, being named in 40% of all failure-to-diagnose breast cancer claims.

That observation has not been lost on future generations of radiologists, many of whom are avoiding mammography.

Mammography has not proved to be a flawless screening tool. It has a difficult time giving a good reading in women with dense breasts. It exposes women year after year to radiation. As every woman knows who has undergone one, it hurts to have breast tissue squished between two pieces of metal. And there is the argument that compressing cancerous tissue will just spread the malignancy.

Researchers have long warned that the compressive force used to obtain useable mammograms may be a contributing factor to breast cancer:

The British standard for the force used to squeeze the breast as flat as possible corresponds to placing twenty 1 kilogram bags of sugar on each breast. Researchers [at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland] fear that this force may be excessive and enough to dislocate and spread any existing cancer cells. Animal experiments have shown that the number of cancer sites can increase by as much as 80% when tumors are manipulated mechanically. A recent study in Malmo, Sweden found that the death rate from breast cancer among women under 55 was 29% higher in a group which had been screened with mammography than in the unscreened control group. [2]

There is mounting evidence that the x-rays from repeated mammograms induce cancer. Dr. John W. Gofman, an authority on the health effects of ionizing radiation, estimates that 75 percent of breast cancer could be prevented by avoiding or minimizing exposure to the ionizing radiation. This includes mammography, x-rays and other medical and dental sources. [3]

“Since a mammogram is basically an x-ray (radiation) of the breast, I do not recommend mammograms to my patients for two reasons: 1) Few radiologists are able to read mammogams correctly, therefore limiting the procedure’s effectiveness. Even the man who developed this technique stated on national television that only about six radiologists in the United States could read them correctly. 2) In addition, each time the breasts are exposed to an x-ray, the risk of breast cancer increases by 2 percent.” [4]


What other options are there?

Digital mammography is a mammography system in which x-ray film is replaced by solid-state detectors that convert x-rays into electric signals. Radiologists find that, like mammograms, it also produces many false positives.


Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is another option. In younger women, this approach offers two advantages: the lack of ionizing radiation and the capability for enhanced imaging of dense breasts. However, this mode has a very high false-positive rate, is expensive, and requires specialized apparatus should a biopsy be necessary.


Thermography is a non-invasive, fifteen minute test. It does not use radiation, does not compress breast tissue, and it is better than mammography at early detection of breast function abnormalities. It has a lot going for it. So why is thermography not more widely practiced?


Thermography debuted in the 1970s as a modern technique, but it was actually first mentioned by Hippocrates in 480 BC. A slurry of mud was spread over the patient. Those areas which dried first were presumed to be “hot” and to indicate pathology of the organs underlying them. In the 1800s, William Herschel was the first to recognize that “dark heat” was emitted and that it behaved like light, could be both reflected and refracted under the right circumstances. His son, John, made an image using solar radiation, focusing the sun’s rays onto a suspension of carbon particles in alcohol. He called this image a “thermogram”. Sensitive healers have been able to detect this heat signature using their own body sensors for thousands of years.


In the 1950s, the military began to use infrared monitoring systems to follow night time troop movements. In 1956, Ray Lawson, MD published a brief article describing a thermocouple device which he used in cases of suspected breast cancer as a diagnostic tool. He found an increased temperature signature of between 3.5º and 1.3º in a series of patients with subsequently proven breast cancer. [5]

When the technology was in its infancy, “eyeballing” the images was the only way to detect abnormalities or asymmetries, and controls and protocols were not always followed. It is little surprise, then, that an article published in CA, A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, concluded, “We have found little evidence to indicate that clinical thermography lowers the stage at detection, and neither does a positive thermogram in screening seem to have a strong predictive value.” [6] When the thermogram was thought to have given a “false positive”, in other words, the thermogram was positive but no tumor was found, this finding was interpreted to mean that the test was inaccurate.


These early researchers were looking for a tool which would be capable of diagnosing breast cancer. What they apparently failed to realize is that thermography will never be capable of diagnosing breast cancer – that it is only under the microscope that cancer can actually be diagnosed. Thermography is a functional test, measuring a heat signature produced by increased vascularity. This may be due to cancer, but it may also be due simply to inflammation without cancer. Mammography cannot diagnose cancer either – it can only diagnose a physical or structural abnormality. The advantage of the thermogram is that we can measure inflammation at an early stage – perhaps even before cancer (a disease of inflammation) has a chance to develop.

In 1972, a position paper was published by the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, in which was stated that thermography was a viable method as a diagnostic procedure in the area of pathology of the human breast. In 1982, the FDA published its approval and classification of thermography as an adjunctive diagnostic screening procedure for the detection of breast cancer.

In the 1990s, significant work was done by the military, in an effort to translate their work with infra-red imaging into the medical field. [7,8]


The Breast Cancer Detection and Demonstration Project (BCDDP) is a multi-center study performed from 1973-79, and was aimed at demonstrating whether thermography could replace mammography or breast examination as a sole screening tool. Unfortunately, there were significant protocol violations, environmental controls were ignored, and many of the personnel who collected the data were untrained in thermography technique, in addition to which there were no established reading protocols. Thus the data collected were poor, many of the images were unreadable, and interpretations were seriously open to question.

The more thermograms turned in so-called false positives, the more suspicion was placed on thermography. Although a decade later many of those “false positive” women were found to have developed breast cancer, the establishment had already spoken, declaring thermography a failure.


Meanwhile, the insurance industry had turned against thermography as well. It is tempting to speculate that it was because juries could clearly see the physiological component of pain and injury due to car accidents, job injuries, and a host of other tort related law suits, making it somewhat more difficult to deny claims related to stress injury.

Eventually, lobbying efforts at the American Medical Association’s House of Delegates and at Medicare, brought about the removal of thermography coverage by insurance companies. Thermography was viewed as a competitive tool to mammography. To this day, the American Cancer Society still promotes only mammography.

International writings on the subject ask questions about mammography that we do not see in the American press.


The major, surprising finding of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study was that there is no evidence that screening for breast cancer with mammography is effective for women under 50 years of age. Not surprisingly, this conclusion has been vehemently attacked by American radiologists. Women in their 40s are the best customers for regular mammograms. As many as 40% of them have an annual mammogram at a cost of $50-100 each. Now another study in Sweden supports the Canadian findings. Dr. Lazlo Tabar followed 35,000 women aged 40-49 for 11 years. He found no evidence that regular mammographic screening of these women had any benefits. [9]


A large study of the benefits of mammography screening for breast cancer was carried out in 2001 by the prestigious Cochrane Institute. The study questioned the benefits of screening and pointed out that screening could be harmful in that it frequently leads to over-diagnosis and over-treatment. The Cochrane Institute has now released the results of a new study aimed at determining how fairly the benefits and dangers of mammography are presented on web sites. They evaluated 13 sites maintained by advocacy groups, 11 maintained by governmental institutions, and 3 maintained by consumer organizations. They found that all the advocacy group sites accepted sponsorship from industry without restriction. The close relationship can perhaps best be summed up in this quote from the Canadian Cancer Society, “Partnership with the Canadian Cancer Society can assist your company in reaching your commercial objectives.” The researchers found that all the governmental agencies and advocacy groups heavily favoured screening and significantly downplayed the drawbacks; the consumer health organizations took a much more balanced view. [10]


Recent advances in technology have brought thermography to the point where it is now used as one of the diagnostic tools in two cancer research centers in North America. Today, there are very strict protocols both for testing and interpreting. Perhaps due to these guidelines, thermography (unlike digital mammography) has exploded in its technique and capabilities.

The consensus among experts is that early detection of breast cancer holds the key to survival. If mammography’s look at structure can detect a cancerous mass, and thermography’s look at systems can detect early suspicions of cancer formation, then it stands to reason thermography can act as an early warning system, giving women the fighting chance they need to win this battle.


Thermography is ideal for women who

  • have had cosmetic or reconstructive surgery (implants)

  • want to avoid radiation

  • have dense breasts

  • are pregnant or nursing


Screening – whether by thermogram, mammogram or any other means – is not diagnosis. Both thermography and mammography demonstrate abnormalities indicating the possibility of the presence of cancer, as well as a host of other breast conditions. These clinical findings require differential diagnosis. Only confirmation of abnormal cell morphology under the microscope can make the definitive diagnosis of cancer.

Neither thermography nor mammography has 100% accuracy. For that matter, physical diagnosis (palpation of the breast) is not 100% accurate either. These tests are the best we have. Any effective tool which does not traumatize the breast or deliver ionizing (mutating) radiation is far preferable as a screening tool to one which causes damage while it is screening.


Thermography is useful for evaluating other parts of the body as well. Thermography is an excellent tool in sports medicine and pain management because it can map inflammation from neurologic or musculoskeletal dysfunction. It can also be of assistance in the evaluation of deep vein thrombosis, insufficiency of the blood supply, and more. We can even see changes in the area of the abdomen which could indicate inflammatory bowel disease like colitis, ileitis or Crohn’s disease.


A brief word about cancer:
Cancer is brought on by inflammation, which may be triggered by trauma. That trauma can take different forms

  • Emotional – such as feelings of unworthiness relating to one’s femininity

  • Mental – such as our mindset about shame that create ongoing brain patterns that manifest physically

  • Physical – such as a car accident, or other direct trauma to the breast


A thermogram which has only “inflammatory” change should prompt further testing in the form of a mammogram. No matter what the mammogram shows, negative or positive, holistic preventive care is appropriate. The patient is encouraged to visit a practitioner of holistic medicine who can help reduce the inflammation and possibly head the problem off at the pass. Inflammatory change will never be seen with mammography, because it only sees anatomy, not function. A negative mammogram in the face of a positive thermogram suggests only that cancer has not developed yet, there is still time for preventive care.


Most cancers are in the body for up to 20 years before they become large enough to see with our crude methods of testing. Let us not waste those 20 years by hiding our heads in the sand. Let us spend them actively seeking healthful practices, excellent nutrition, and adequate exercise. Let us encourage the removal of all toxins from the body – cigarettes, alcohol, drugs, pharmaceuticals, worry, anxiety, resentment and fear. And, above all, let us practice gratitude, that our lives may be abundantly full and joyful. Then inflammation will decrease on all levels, and health will be restored.


“But breast cancer runs in my family, so I will get it too.” Not necessarily. If trauma, stress, and lack of good nutrition culminate in disease, then where is the weak spot? Where is the body most likely to break down? If breast cancer runs in the family, then indeed, a person may develop breast cancer. If arthritis, another inflammatory immune system disorder, runs in the family, another person may develop joint problems instead. If a person takes better than average care of herself, mentally and physically, she may not fall prey to breast cancer even though it runs in the family. There may be an inherited a pre-disposition, but that does not necessarily mean that it will develop.


The Susan G. Komen Foundation funded a study released in May, 2007, that essentially found that our increasingly polluted and toxic environment is much to blame for the rise in cancer. As reported in the press: [11]

More than 200 chemicals – many found in urban air and everyday consumer products – cause breast cancer in animal tests, according to a compilation of scientific reports published today.

Writing in a publication of the American Cancer Society, researchers concluded that reducing exposure to the compounds could prevent many women from developing the disease.


The research team from five institutions analyzed a growing body of evidence linking environmental contaminants to breast cancer, the leading killer of U.S. women in their late 30s to early 50s.

Experts say that family history and genes are responsible for a small percentage of breast cancer cases but that environmental or lifestyle factors such as diet are probably involved in the vast majority.

In other words, environmental toxins continually pollute the body. Our natural detoxification systems work less efficiently over time. More free radicals are formed, damaging our DNA. The stage is set for disease.

Thermography is a screening tool which can help raise suspicions of breast cancer at an early stage, when there is still chance of complete cure.

[1] American College of Clinical Thermography. Accessed August 2007 at http://www.thermologyonline.org/breast_thermography_procedure.htm[2] The Lancet, July 11, 1992, p. 122[3] John W. Gofman, M.D., Ph.D., Radiation from Medical Procedures in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease, C.N.R. Book Division, Committee for Nuclear Responsibility, Inc., San Francisco, 1999[4] Francisco Contreras, MD; The Hope of Living Cancer Free, Creation House, 1999, page 104[5] Lawson R. Implications of Surface Temperatures in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Canad MAJ 75:309-310 (Aug 15, 1956).[6] Moskowitz M. Screening for Breast Cancer: How Effective Are Our Tests? A Critical Review. CA Cancer J Clin 1983;33:26039.[7] Diakides NA. Medical Applications of IR Focal Plane Arrays, – Final rept. Advanced Concepts Analysis Inc Falls Church Va. NTIS report # ARO-32870.1- EL-S.[8] Paul JL, Lupo JC. From tanks to tumors. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, IEEE 21;6:34-36 (Nov-Dec 2002).[9] Charlotte Gray, US resistance to Canadian mammogram study not only about data, Canadian Medical Association Journal, Vol. 148, No. 4, February 15, 1993, pp. 622-23[10] Jorgensen, KJ and Gotzsche, PC. Presentation on websites of possible benefits and harms from screening for breast cancer: cross sectional study. British Medical Journal, Vol. 328, January 17, 2004, pp. 148-53[11] Marla Cone, Common chemicals are linked to breast cancer, Los Angeles Times, May 14, 2007

Our imaging equipment is capable of producing high resolution images.  This is extremely important when choosing a thermography lab for your screening.  Equipment that is out-of-date and low resolution is of little benefit when it comes to producing quality images that can be interpreted properly.  In the last few years, thermography equipment has improved greatly. Cameras today are able to produce quality images and are capable of showing vascular pattern images, which are key in detecting abnormal vascularity. Key questions to ask a thermography lab when choosing where to have your screening are:

How old is your camera?

What resolution is your camera?

Can your equipment produce grayscale images? (of utmost importance especially in breast imaging!)

Is your equipment FDA cleared?

Our Services

Full Breast Screening Scan - In depth scan with added images for face and neck area OR Abdomen area.  This is an excellent screening for women of child-bearing age all the way to post-menopausal aged women. It gives insight into hormonal changes/issues, thyroid issues as well as detection of physiological changes that can be a sign of early breast cancer. 


Limited Breast Scan - Usually for recheck areas, or for follow-up scans once a baseline scan has been done. It includes the basic breast images and underarm areas.   

Full Body Scan - Includes full breast scan, thyroid area, back, abdomen, feet, legs, arms, hands, face and sinus areas, with special attention to lymphatic areas.  For men, this scan does include chest/breast area also.                 

Thyroid Scan  - Includes full facial views as well as thyroid.                    

Half Body Scan - Can be either lower or upper body.  Breast scan can be added for additional charge. Additional areas may be added as well.  We can determine which is most cost effective for the combinations you request.                

Additional Regions  can be done alone or added to any scan for an additional charge.  We try to make it most cost effective for you, so charges will vary and sometimes it is less costly to do a half or full body scan depending on the additional areas you are requesting. 


Call us for an appointment that fits your schedule


Patient Protocols

Once you have set your appointment with us, we will send you the necessary paperwork to fill out through a HIPAA compliant secure site.  The information on this form is vital to having a successful report and interpretation by our doctor. Please make sure to answer every question. If you have any questions regarding the paperwork, please call us and we are happy to assist  you with it.  

We will also be sending you instructions to follow prior to your scan.  These instructions must be followed exactly, as it also greatly affects the outcome of having a successful scan and accurate report.  

What to Expect at Your Appointment

At your appointment, the Certified Thermographic Technician will ask you to disrobe for the areas being imaged. Thermography can only be utilized without clothing, as clothing prevents temperature readings of the skin’s surface. You will then have an acclimation period for at least 15 minutes.  This acclimation is VERY important for an accurate screening and report. During this time the surface of your body will be acclimating to the surrounding room temperature and thus preventing false readings from things such as tight clothing, bra straps, outside weather and many other factors that would affect skin surface temperatures.  


The technician will leave the room for you to relax while acclimating.  At the end of the 15 minute acclimation period you will then be positioned in front of a specialized thermal imaging camera that is highly sensitive to temperature readings.  The technician will ask you to move in certain positions in front of the camera in order to get a full picture of the areas being screened. There is NO CONTACT, NO RADIATION, harmful or invasive techniques included in thermographic imaging.  It's just like having your photo taken, only it is seen as colorful images and grayscale patterns through the lens and translated to a computer screen. 

The whole imaging process takes from 15 minutes to 30 minutes depending on what areas are being screened.  Once complete you may get dressed, and yes, apply your deodorant ladies! (We know that is the worst part of the process for many women)! You can go and enjoy the rest of your day.  


The technician is not qualified to read your thermal images or give you any information or advice regarding them. You will not get your results at the time of the thermography appointment as the images taken by the technician will need to be analyzed and interpreted by our doctor. 


What to Expect Following your Appointment

Your images will be interpreted by a Board Certified doctor who is trained through the International Academy of Clinical Thermology (IACT). 

This in-depth analysis and multi-page report usually takes between 7 and 14 business days to complete. 

Reports will be issued to you directly through our HIPAA compliant email service in a digital format so you may enjoy the high resolution images. We recommend reviewing your results with your doctor. You will see various measurements and comments based on the thermologist's findings that may need further investigation by your physician. Medical thermology reports are easy to understand by your doctor as their training in physiology and anatomy is extensive. If your doctor is not familiar with thermography or needs help understanding the report, our doctor is available for consultation.

All records are stored according to HIPAA guidelines.


Factors that may Affect Thermography Results

Not all tests are 100% accurate. It is important to combine different modes of testing for the most optimal outcome. The following factors may affect successful outcome measures:

  • Age

  • Obesity

  • Ability to stay still in the proper positions

  • Adherence to patient protocols

  • Excessive bra use

  • Seat warmers

  • Over-exercising

  • Caffeine use

  • Medications altering hormones such as birth control

  • Extra large breasts

  • Breast implants

Disclaimer:  Breast thermography is not a replacement or alternative for mammography or any other form of breast imaging.  Breast thermography is meant to be used in addition to mammography and other tests. Breast thermography and mammography are complementary screening tools.  Mammography is anatomical and thermography is physiological.  They cannot be compared as in "apples to apples" as each is capable of rendering two completely different pictures of breast health.  Thermography reports identify thermal emissions that suggest potential abnormal/risk markers. Thermography does not diagnose cancers. The only tool for diagnosis is biopsy and a pathological study of the tissue.  No breast screening method is 100% accurate. The information provided on this website is intended for educational purposes and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice.  Thermography Imaging of North Georgia, L.L.C. has no liability to any person or entity for any adverse consequence related directly or indirectly to the material provided on this website. All reports provided to a client should be followed up with a professional medical doctor for further investigation if deemed necessary. Thermography equipment used by Thermography Imaging of North Georgia, L.L.C. is FDA 510K cleared as an adjunct screening device.

  • Instagram
  • Facebook